Sunday, 17 August 2014

negative learning

This definition is best explained by the following, from my post on the topic:
There is a tendency to assume that, simply because we try to have a positive, effective learning environment in schools and elsewhere, that the only learning we can do is as a result of positive experiences.
That is not so. If, as a child, I am burned, I learn that fire can be dangerous, and that is actually a useful lesson. Mind you, yes, it would be better if I had simply listened, but some people NEED to learn the hard way. (sigh ... :) )

The other thing to keep in mind is that we do experience a form of learning or training from negative experiences in life that may be less useful - in most cases, it seems that being disappointed or hurt by others (especially in love - e.g., having a partner die on them which, despite our best attempts to be rational if the death was accidental or from illness or other causes out of direct control, can still be perceived as abandonment) can contribute to being wary or reticent about being involved with others in future. That is a form of learning. Counselling will help overcome that to an extent, but then determination and effort is required to unlearn the habits that have been set in place by the negative learning.

This also applies to negative experiences from past lives. As an example, if you had been burned to death as a witch, you may be reluctant to get involved in anything connected with Wicca/witchcraft/paganism - you may, in fact, seem to be irrationally and vehemently opposed to such matters. The perception irrationality is simply because so few of us can perceive from one lifetime to another. In this case, a past life regression will help, and is the equivalent (if properly done!) of counselling now. Having done that, however, some persistent effort is required to break the habit that was taught and ingrained by our past, negative learning experience (look up Trauma Encoded Emotional Memory, or TEEM, which I think was developed by the author of the Neanderthal Predation theory).

Personally, I look further back (see here and here), to see if I had that experience because of a wrong I had committed previously - i.e., was this a negative karmic return? If it WAS, I celebrate - because undoing karma is actually a lot easier than having to do the learning that is required if the experience was to force you to look at some part of yourself that you've been avoiding.

Of course, it could simply have been due to, in modern lingo,
randomness ... I suppose :)

To put this into context, consider the following, from Nine Lies About Work: A Freethinking Leader’s Guide to the Real World by Marcus Buckingham, Ashley Goodall: 

“Positive attention, in other words, is thirty times more powerful than negative attention in creating high performance on a team. (It’s also, if you’re keeping score, twelve hundred times more powerful than ignoring people)”

 

Highest Spiritual Good



For this definition I am going to use the definition I developed for my workshops and Ranger course (the format is for the latter), although I have taken out the Figures and reference to them from the Assumptions section.
1.6.4.8.1               Concept
The concept of “Highest Spiritual Good” is the idea that the best outcome from the point of view of the spiritual development/growth of individuals and/or groups of people in any situation may involve events/actions/situations that are not what the individuals/groups involved consider pleasant or desirable.

Thus, for instance, one may not receive healing to cure an illness so that one may repay a negative karmic debt.

By the same token, it may be for the Highest Spiritual Good that you achieve more than you could by your own effort, whether that is for return of your positive karmic debt, or to enable you to be of benefit to others, and hence something like a troubling health problem may have a seemingly miraculous cure.
1.6.4.8.2               Objectives
The objectives of this section are to provide a basic comprehension of the concept of Highest Spiritual Good, including the fact that it can result in benefits as well as what may appear to be hindrances.
1.6.4.8.3               Desired outcomes
Equanimity in the face of Highest Spiritual Good - whether that results in helping or hindering your situation.
1.6.4.8.4               Assumptions
Key assumptions are:

Ø  we have a non-physical part of our being (actually, several);

Ø  some part of this non-physical essence survives the death of the physical body; and

Ø  the essence which survives the physical death is capable of reincarnating into a different body.

Another assumption is that you are familiar with the concept of spiritual growth, including the notion that this Earth is a form of school, and our incarnations here are, to greater or lesser extent, for the purpose of promoting the growth of our “soul” (Higher Self).
1.6.4.8.5               Background
A term I was taught is Highest Spiritual Good, which is term acknowledging that you may have to go through turmoil and challenges and trouble - not only for karmic reasons, but also because you may need the strengthening experience, or you may have agreed to take something on to see whether others would help you (i.e., as a test of a friend, perhaps), or this may be needed to motivate you into learning thoroughly.

Something I differ from Buddhism and some other groups that teach about karma, is that I do not consider that everything is due to karma. There are learning experiences, tests etc. along the way - and I am of the opinion that there is some intelligent force (Goddess, Allah, JHVH, Great Spirit, God or whatever term you wish to use) having an influence on how karma and the universe work.

Hence, no matter how good your application of the techniques we will be learning about in this workshop, they may not work for you in all situations.

Now, there is a flip side to this as well: it may be for your Highest Spiritual Good to have some “troubles” removed from your life despite you not having the ability to do so by your own efforts. In other words, Highest Spiritual Good is not just about you losing out in some way, it can also act in your favour.

You cannot argue for HSG in terms of only one of these aspects (say, the negative outcomes): if you accept the concept, you must, in all honesty, argue for both manifestations of it, just as anyone who accepts karma must really argue for good karma as much as bad.
1.6.4.8.6               Techniques
There are no particular techniques to apply here. This is about a concept, so all that is required is for you to think about this, and maybe identify where you could benefit from an increased awareness of it. It is worth asking your guides to help teach you about this during your sleep state, and maybe even meditating on it.
1.6.4.8.7               Alternative viewpoints
Another view of “Highest Spiritual Good” is that it is of what is best, overall, in a situation. I actually consider this concept to be the “Greatest Spiritual Good”, and consider that it is different.

To illustrate, consider someone approaching an intersection during peak hour that is “blocked” – which means they cannot pass through the intersection and be clear of it. If the person enters the intersection, and is stopped with their car still in the intersection when the lights change, those cars wanting to go the other way cannot move. The “greatest good”, in this case the greatest driving good, would be for the person being considered to NOT enter the intersection unless they can completely clear it, so they do not block other cars.

However, what might be for the person’s Highest Spiritual Good is for them to enter the intersection, block other cars,. and be abused by the drivers they have blocked so that they learn to have more consideration for other people. In other words, it may be for the person’s Highest Spiritual Good to undergo an unpleasant experience (i.e., the abuse of others who they have prevented from driving through the intersection) in order to learn a lesson that is important for the person’s spiritual development – in this case, consideration of others.
It is also worth reading the definition of "negative learning".

As of the time this definition was written, I’ve touched on this idea in the following posts:

     Post No.- 516 - For tonight's meditation, and a few other thoughts (in the section "Yelling at the Gods")
     Post No. 467 - Living in chakras and other stuff - Part II (in the section "A Cautionary Note: Ethics")
     Post No. 466 - Protecting my life
     Post No. 446 - The need to simplify life, and some speculations (in the section "A speculation: work harder)
     Post No. 443 - Oops (in the Post Script)
     Post No. 413 - Forms, living in chakras (more), fear, and some miscellaneous thoughts (in the section "Forms")
     Post No. 346 - A ritual for the Kulin People's Kangaroo-Apple season (and such references will be found in many other rituals I've written, which I will not list here)
     Post No. 323 - Asking for protection
     Post No. 319 - Psychic attack
     Post No. 307 - Non-physical health and strength
     Post No. 259 - Does rescue involve lying?
     Post No. 178 - Fear (in Note 1)
     Post No. 090 - Logic flaws
     Post No. 058 - Healing
     Post No. 031 - Emotions and spellcraft
     Post No. 029 - Protection
     Post No. 001 - A workshop on crystals
 


Tuesday, 12 August 2014

clearing

I am currently working on a series to extend knowledge of this concept, after which I will possibly re-write this definition. For now, interim posts on that are: 

 
For the purposes of this site and the blog it refers to, ‘clearing’ means to use positive (‘spiritually constructive’ * ) energy to dissolve, negate or remove something which is negative (‘spiritually destructive’ * ).

 * My interpretation of this is informed by the philosophy of Balanced Positivity.

As of the time this definition was written, I’ve touched on this idea in the following posts:
     Post No. 708 - How do I clear or channel specific emotion ‘X’? 

Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typos may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis   https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/