- ‘cooperative’, and
- ‘uncooperative’.
In a nutshell, a
‘cooperative’ entity is one who, although they may be confused, in pain,
afraid, of blinded by scepticism or religious dogma, has no fundamental
objection to being rescued.
This is the type of
entity I’ve found generally described in most other people’s writings on the
topic of (spirit) rescue. They may need healing, cleansing (i.e., clearing of negative
units), coaxing, gentle talking to resolve confusion, etc, etc, etc - some of
possibly firm to the point of being forceful - before they are able to pass
over, but once you’ve enabled them to realise their state of being, and that
there is somewhere (pleasant) for them to go to, they will pass over.
An ‘uncooperative’,
on the other hand, deliberately, wilfully and actively resists being rescued -
i.e., refuses to leave the earth plane for the astral.
This is the type of
entity who often already knows that they’re dead, and is enjoying being able to
take acts of vengeance and to manipulate and control others. They’re behaviour
is typically sadistic, or even what many people would simply describe as
‘evil’. These people actively fight tooth and nail against passing over, and
will resort to any dirty trick they can - including niggling rescuers about
sensitivities and vulnerabilities.
You need to be
strong, persistent, skilled, capable, and gifted with first class support /
back up to take on the task of clearing an uncooperative. (Dawn Hill also has an example in one of her books about the power of
compassion in this work as well - see this post of mine.)
Fortunately they’re
less common than cooperatives. It can, however, be rewarding to free people of
the loathsome influence of an uncooperative. On the down side, sometimes the
aim is harm minimisation: just as the police would disarm or stop someone doing
harm with a weapon, so too is it often necessary for the sake of the uncooperative’s victims
to forcefully stop the uncooperative doing any more harm - which basically
comes down to clearing the negative units the uncooperative is using.
As of the time this
definition was written, I’ve touched on this idea in the following posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.