PPS - I am finding more and more Westerners using karma as an excuse to victim blame others, or indulge in spiritual bypassing. It is neither: it is a tool for YOU to use to take responsibility for what YOU have done. Anyone who claims otherwise is either amathiac, lying, or incompetent.
As an interim 'definition', please refer to the following posts http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/search/label/karma, particularly:
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2007/06/workshop-on-past-lives-part-1-working.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2007/10/judging-others.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2008/03/know-thyself-be-thyself-and-occlumency.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/film-flatliners-and-personal.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2009/12/could-there-be-sort-of-karmic.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2010/01/judging-others-people-who-experience.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com/2010/04/distant-marriages-and-growth.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2010/05/no-rest-for.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/personal-responsibility.html;
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2011/02/random-thoughts.html (which discusses group karma, which some people dispute exists: make up your own mind, Dear Reader - don't believe either me or them); and
- http://gnwmythr.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/post-no-599-language-links-to-concepts.html.
PS - There is some bad information and misconceptions around the topic of karma, incidentally. For instance, this article
portrays the "solution" to karma as self acceptance and spiritual love
for all, and claims that karma only exists in the physical world.
That
is wrong: karma, the Principle of Cause and Effect, or whatever other
term you want to use for it, applies in all levels of existence - and
applies just as equally to "good" things as to "bad".
It is also a cop out from dealing with our past mistakes - wishful thinking, in a sense, hoping that it will all just go away, rather than BEING AN ADULT,
and accepting (spiritual)responsibility for the consequences of our
past actions on other people and making genuine and credible efforts to
help heal them of what we have done. This weakness of character (cop out / wishful thinking)
is effectively a limit on our manifestation of spiritual love - and
THAT is probably the worst part of this rubbish article (and others like
it).
I don't deny that it is difficult to do all this - I been driven to the limit (and am there right now in some aspects of life)
by karmic AND OTHER spiritual lessons / challenges. However, we have
other strengths we can call on, and, in the context of karma, one of
greatest is our Higher Self.
The
Higher Self is also one of the biggest weaknesses of the article I
referenced at the start of this note: it is not us but our "better self"
that decides when we have learned a karmic lesson.
PPS - for anyone who is interested in the concept of atoning for the wrongs they have done, there is line worth considering from Episode 17 "Underneath" of the TV series "Angel", in Season 5, at about 9:44:
"The thing about atonement is, you never run out of chances. But you got to take them."
In fact, significant chunks of that series cover the concept of trying to atone - not necessarily in ways that I agree with, but it may be worth you, Dear Reader, considering watching the series from that perspective.
For my original writing ONLY on this blog:
Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024 NO AI I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Links to others works and excerpts from others works are NOT covered by the hereinbefore, and remain subject to the conditions of the original source.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.