In Stuart Holroyd’s
magnificent book "Briefing
for the Landing on Planet Earth", he describes contact with a
group known as “The Nine” (who crop up in
a few other places as well). They have some interesting views on a range of
matters, one of which is that we should be aiming to be “balanced positive” –
i.e., not negative, but not “holier than thou” extremist (fanatical?) versions of spirituality.
My personal ‘code
word’ that I was taught (see here) to use for all those people who seek
to have, or to help others to have, ‘balanced positive spirituality’, is ‘Divine
Light Force’, abbreviated to DLF. It covers all references to ‘White (i.e., positive energy’)
Brotherhoods/Sisterhoods’ and hierarchies of all sorts.
To some extent, this
is predicated on the association between ‘higher frequency’, or more evolved,
energies and a perception of brightness, but it also is based on the concept of
Deity, as in ‘the Divine’.
I now use (one of) the phrase(s) ‘Balanced
Positive’, ‘Balanced Positive Light Forces’, ‘Balanced Positive Light Force’,
or ‘Balanced Positive Light’ which is
based on the teaching in Holroyd’s book, rather than DLF – and the appropriate
acronym (i.e., BPF, BPLF, or BPL,
typically).
For the opposite of
Balanced Positive, I use non-BPF or non-BPLF (or non-BPL), whereas I used to
use non-DLF.
Subsequent to writing the above definition, I have started developing this into a philosophical approach to living, which I am terming 'Balanced Positivity'.
As of the time this
definition was written, I’ve touched on this idea in posts here,
here,
here
and here.I've speculated here about the history of Balanced Positivity, that it goes back to the Pagan philosophers Plato and Aristotle. For other links that are relevant to this topic, see the "Balanced Positivity, Spiritual Maturity, Peace and Personal Conduct" sub-section of the "Key posts: a (slightly!) shorter listing ... " section of my Blogiography.
PS - see also:
As I continue my current project to apply labels and update past projects, the posts the above link to will probably change. I will also, at some dim, distant, future date, probably revise this definition.
For my original writing ONLY on this blog:
Copyright © Kayleen White 2016-2024 NO AI
I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence
(AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or
other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to
reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise replicate any part of
this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product. Otherwise,
fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Links to others works and excerpts from others works are NOT covered by the hereinbefore, and remain subject to the conditions of the original source.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.