Gnwmythr's Glossary: checking

One of the aspects of psychic work that I consider an absolute, utter BASIC, is that of checking (along with grounding, shielding, flaming, etc). This crops up at such basic levels as . . . checking that you are actually protected when you ask for it . . . checking that you are actually communicating with BPM Guides ... and making sure you are finished.

Making sure one has finished, you ask? (Well, I hope you do - I’ll run with it anyway.) Yes, finished.

A fairly common example of this in my life is when I am checking with my BPM Guides (after checking that they are who they claim to be!) in a protected environment (which I have checked) whether or not I have finished giving someone the healing they are meant to have.

It also crops up in the context of doing things like charging (consecrating) a tetrahedron [1] or doing some clearing exercises or work.

My preference is to do such work with someone independently checking that I have actually done all that I should.

It is fairly easy to do. I ask someone, usually my exercise / work partner, to ask their BPM Guides for an impression of a milk bottle (a glass bottle, for you young ‘uns who don’t know what that is), and to be given an impression of how much of the work to be done has actually been done by showing how full the bottle is :

· if it is half full, I have done half the work;

· if it is three-quarters full, I have done three-quarters of the work;

· if we all agree it is full, then - and only then - we have finished.

This is a technique I learned when learning to do rescue of uncooperatives [2] . If you’re doing that sort of work, it is extremely unwise to allow an entity to outlast (“defeat”) you, as that risks sending out a signal that if an entity shows strength “X” or persistence “Y”, you can be beaten.

Hence, we had some extraordinarily long nights, but we did our work.

These days, I tend to check before I start how much pre-weakening and other measures I can do to shorten the time (I have family and other commitments). “Hey BPM Guide, if I do 4 hours of clearing on Target Z tomorrow, how much will the 2 hours and 30 minutes required the day after to actually rescue Target Z be reduced by? ... 2 hours and 5 minutes? Great!”

Sound militaristic? It is, and it may need to be, when you’re working on dangerous and strong entities who are actively seeking to psychically enslave and torment others. (Although there have been some extraordinarily powerful examples of what can be done with agape - and ALL clearing MUST inherently be done with love [BPM nonphysical energy].)

You, Dear Reader, don’t have to do anything so demanding to get value from checking, however, so, please do actually CHECK to make sure things are actually happening as you wish and/or expect.

There is one other aspect to consider here : yes/no questions. An example from a rune reading was whether or not I should pass on one particular aspect of an interpretation which could be upsetting for my client (I don’t just pass on everything I receive without question : I feel perfectly free to challenge my BPM Guides to clarify / explain things further). So, I asked my client and, in the end, two other people, to get from their BPM Guides (I set up the protection for them) an impression of either a purple giraffe or a blue pumpkin : one symbol meant yes, I should pass that aspect of the interpretation on, the other meant I shouldn’t. By avoiding “yes” or “no”, I avoid the bias that many people have towards “yes” (particularly if people are interested in spirituality, they often have a tendency to want to be “nice”, and that often biases them towards saying “yes” [I also avoid using green and red for people in developed countries, as traffic lights have green for go and red for stop, and the same sort of bias can come through]). Naturally, I didn’t tell any of these people what the question was until they had answered, and I also specified for the two other people, who were in one room together, that, when they had an answer, they stated that they had an answer, but they didn’t say what it was until both had received an answer - which prevents those who get answers faster from influencing those who are slower psychically, possibly owing to less experience or lower confidence (if I want to take an extra measure against influence, I may get them to write their answer down, but I could trust these two enough not to have to do that).

There are some possibly useful flow charts on this at my regression-rescue manual site : see the asking yes/no questions and making decisions charts towards the end of the post at http://regression-rescue.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/general-flow-charts-discussion.html.

[1] See http://www.gnwmythr.com/talismanictetrahedrons.html.

Gnwmythr's Glossary

Wednesday, 31 December 2014

checking

No comments:

Post a Comment